| Not a member yet? Register for FREE! |
| ||||||
| Science & Technology Discuss various technologies, finance and science. |
| JOIN TODAY! It's FREE . . . Discuss topics and issues that matter to you!
8,000 active members posting their views, facts and opinions on issues and topics that are important to people of today. Join a Discussion or better yet and Start a Discussion of your own! |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Dogs don't make mistakes. | Doubtful. Wikipedia is backed by a large foundation and has a larger base of contributors (and seems likely to continue to). |
|
FIRST RULE OF WRITING POSTS: Think, think, write, think again, submit. Quote:
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; the courage to change the things I can; and the wisdom to know the difference. | |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Dogs don't make mistakes. | 'Better' isn't just defined by article quality but widescale usage and recognition. |
|
FIRST RULE OF WRITING POSTS: Think, think, write, think again, submit. Quote:
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; the courage to change the things I can; and the wisdom to know the difference. | |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Just getting started | i just heard the first time about citizendium. wikipedia is much more popular than it! i think wikipedia is fine for the first impression about a topic, but if you want to get a step further you will have to use a more reliable source (that is, books or websites from universities i think) |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Discussion starter | I think Citizendium should win, as long as they get popular enough. The accountability is much better, and you will know that they are really giving you good information. All the while they still let users contribute. |
| Quote:
| |
| | |