| Not a member yet? Register for FREE! |
| ||||||
| Religion, Philosophy, Sociology and Ethics Discussion & debates of different Religions and philosophies. Please try to remain respectful. |
| JOIN TODAY! It's FREE . . . Discuss topics and issues that matter to you!
8,000 active members posting their views, facts and opinions on issues and topics that are important to people of today. Join a Discussion or better yet and Start a Discussion of your own! |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Super Moderator Join Date: May 2007 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 998
| The phrase "water is wet" is often given as a statement that's so obviously true, that the truth can't be questioned. But is the phrase "water is wet" really true? This is not obvious to me. Unpacking meaning, "wet" likely just means "like water." Consider how this word is learned ... by experiencing water, then generalizing to other liquids like milk and paint. When we say "the paint is wet" we are likely just saying "the paint is like water" ... meaning liquid. So a statement like "Water is wet" is probably just saying something like "Water is like water" at bottom. Since "water is like water" is simply repeating the same thing twice (the trivial case of the 'like' operator), it's really more a redundancy than a truth. Worse it introduces possible error. If we want to be real sticklers, we could even say "Water is like water" is technically false. That water isn't "like" water but is exactly the same thing. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2007 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,648
| Well you bring up an interesting point. Here's my take. Let's adjust the definition of 'wet' a bit. 1. Having the properties of water. 2. Has water on it. (e.g. the towel is wet) I think #1 is the appropriate one for the statement "water is wet." Clearly, water has the properties of water. It's a tautology. That being the case, I think the statement "water is wet" works just fine. "Having the properties of" is much more clear than simply "like" and avoids the confusion that you mention. |
| "Give a man fire, and he will be warm for a day; set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his (short) life."---Wofl | |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| Long Gone For Good Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,236
| Quote:
) if the sign says 'wet paint' and the paint is 'tacky'? Because the 'wet' paint is no longer 'like' water or 'watery'. | |
|
Long Gone For Good
| ||
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Needs a new custom title Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 557
| Wow, I never thought there were so many definitions for wet. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Super Moderator Join Date: May 2007 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 998
| Quote:
It's not clear that tautologies are true statements. A common view is that mathematical statements are neither true nor false. IMO a mathematical axiom like '1=0' is perfectly valid, just not very useful. Maybe one could think of it as a degenerate case like '1=0 (mod 1)'. In this case "Water is wet" could be neither true nor false. Also, IMO the object/property way of talking is also reducible to the more basic concepts of 'similiarity' and 'difference'. For example, if something is brown and solid, we don't call it water. IOW we classify things into object catagories, to begin with, based on similarity and differences. Then we call something a property if there's a similarity between all the objects. | |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Super Moderator Join Date: May 2007 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 998
| Quote:
I suppose it might be partly false in that case. (I see truth as a matter of degree). But that's a good question. | |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Stirrer Of Shit | wet = liquid state |
| Eric "For whoever habitually suppresses the truth in the interests of tact will produce a deformity from the womb of his thought." -Sir Basil H. Liddel-Hart "How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin."—Ronald Reagan http://self-composed.com | |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) | ||
| Moderator Join Date: May 2007 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,648
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| "Give a man fire, and he will be warm for a day; set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his (short) life."---Wofl | |||
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2007 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,648
| By that definition, oil would be considered wet. That bothers my intuitive understanding of the word. Also, that would make a 'wet towel' actually not wet, as the towel is clearly not a liquid. But then, that's an entirely different usage of the word 'wet'. Does the fact that I am enjoying this discussion suggest that I am a geek? |
| "Give a man fire, and he will be warm for a day; set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his (short) life."---Wofl | |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Stirrer Of Shit | H20 can exist in various states - liquid, solid, and gas. At a certain pressure and temperature, it can exist in all three states simultaneously. |
| Eric "For whoever habitually suppresses the truth in the interests of tact will produce a deformity from the womb of his thought." -Sir Basil H. Liddel-Hart "How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin."—Ronald Reagan http://self-composed.com | |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) | |||
| Stirrer Of Shit | Quote:
Oil is liquid.Quote:
Quote:
| |||
| Eric "For whoever habitually suppresses the truth in the interests of tact will produce a deformity from the womb of his thought." -Sir Basil H. Liddel-Hart "How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin."—Ronald Reagan http://self-composed.com | ||||
| | |