| Not a member yet? Register for FREE! |
| ||||||
| Religion, Philosophy, Sociology and Ethics Discussion & debates of different Religions and philosophies. Please try to remain respectful. |
| JOIN TODAY! It's FREE . . . Discuss topics and issues that matter to you!
8,000 active members posting their views, facts and opinions on issues and topics that are important to people of today. Join a Discussion or better yet and Start a Discussion of your own! |
| View Poll Results: Will machines ever "feel" pain | |||
| No. They will never feel sensations. | | 4 | 36.36% |
| Yes. They will feel sensations. | | 6 | 54.55% |
| I don't know. | | 1 | 9.09% |
| Other. | | 0 | 0% |
| Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Eligible for a custom title Join Date: May 2007 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 750
| As machines become more like humans (for example, artificially intelligent neural networks) will they eventually be able to "feel" pain? I don't mean acting as if they did, but actually feeling the sensation of pain? Or is there something about an organism that is required for this sensation to occur? |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Retired User Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 372
| This could easily bring in a plethora of other thoughts but... what is pain except that it's a signal sent by the nerves to the brain which are interpreted and some kind of standard reaction results. It's possible now for a computer to be equipped with the proper sensors and programmed to respond in a certain fashion (eg., move away from where the "pain" occurred). I see no difference between "acting" as if it feels pain, and feeling pain. The stimuli, process, and result are the same. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Dog of the Soul Crusher Join Date: May 2007 Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 569
| |
| In case it wasn't apparent, sarcasm is yet another free service I offer. Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay -- and claims a halo for his dishonesty.---- Robert A. Heinlein | |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Chuck Norris Join Date: May 2007 Location: London, England
Posts: 330
| Quote:
| |
| http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/ "Creationism is not a scientific alternative to natural selection any more than the stork theory is an alternative to sexual reproduction." — Hayes, 1996. | ||
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | ||
| Eligible for a custom title Join Date: May 2007 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 750
| But couldn't the sensation of pain be an unexpected consequence? Especially now that we are starting to use the human brain as a model ... for example: "Researchers at IBM's Watson Laboratory in Yorktown Heights, N.Y., are trying to make the model even more complex, building layered neural networks that behave according to biological characteristics of the nervous systems of vertebrates." from: Neural Networks & Connectionist Systems Quote:
Two behaviorists walk into a bar. One says "Your fine." The other replies "So are you." ![]() (behaviorists do not distinguish between directly observable and non-observable psychological states) Quote:
Although ... now that I think about it, I wonder what kind of ethical issues this might create. Would it be wrong if a wiz kid made a machine feel intense amounts of pain? Part of me wants to say 'no'... | ||
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Chuck Norris Join Date: May 2007 Location: London, England
Posts: 330
| i dont think giving machines the choice to inflict harm on people or not is a good idea, but the ability to realise they are being damaged and move away from the industrial furnace or whatevers hurting them makes sense to me. |
| http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/ "Creationism is not a scientific alternative to natural selection any more than the stork theory is an alternative to sexual reproduction." — Hayes, 1996. | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Dog of the Soul Crusher Join Date: May 2007 Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 569
| Quote:
Asimov had it about right. | |
| In case it wasn't apparent, sarcasm is yet another free service I offer. Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay -- and claims a halo for his dishonesty.---- Robert A. Heinlein | ||
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| ^_^; Join Date: May 2007 Location: Cairo,Egypt
Posts: 1,203
| As said before in this topic, it depends on what you define pain as. Physical pain is just electrical messages sent to the brain from the damaged part in the body, and could be done with machines/robots. But emotional pain, is IMO impossible. Extreme Coder |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Commentator Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 50
| Your right, a robot on an assembly line will never feel pain. A robot built like a planetary lander will acknowledge damage. A robot that we've all seen in science fiction shows that behave very human like is altogether different. Today the processing requirements necessary just to stand vertically is substantial. To move, act and be able to communicate will come sooner rather than later. Of course you can program the robot to operate very simply but I remember watching a show about AI and in simple desktops, programs that are most frequently used will start up faster because the system has learned your habits. This hadn't been programed, the system learned by itself, is this a step towards sentience? Now add this to the computational resources of a robot that has the ability to walk and communicate. Will it learn, will it develop a sense of self, of emotion that will interpret the sensory messages as pain. |
|
thoughts from my igloo Dave | |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Eligible for a custom title Join Date: May 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 107
| The real question is not whether or not machines will be able to feel pain (a machine that is programmed to sense an overheating component feels pain), but whether or not they will ever be conscious, thinking things. And my answer is... certainly not in the near future. This is my opinion simply because we don't even know what consciousness is, much less how to fabricate it. |
| | |