| Not a member yet? Register for FREE! |
| ||||||
| News and Politics News and Politics discussions. US Politics, International Politics, US news, International news. |
| JOIN TODAY! It's FREE . . . Discuss topics and issues that matter to you!
8,000 active members posting their views, facts and opinions on issues and topics that are important to people of today. Join a Discussion or better yet and Start a Discussion of your own! |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Super Moderator | In particular, does a vote construe a voter's support for the system in which they vote? For instance, if I vote in a US General Election, irrespective of whom I vote for, does that imply that I buy into the US government as a system? By the way, I ask this because I've heard people mention several times that they don't vote because it "lends credence to the system." And I kind of wanted to discuss the idea. Last edited by Iandefor : 11-18-2007 at 08:22 PM. |
| Bovina Sancta! Mohandas Gandhi broke the law, too. | |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Super Moderator | I don't think it necessarily does. All a vote necessarily says about a voter is that they recognize they're in a system whose course will have a direct impact on their lives and they have an opportunity to have at least some (however small) say in that system. It doesn't necessarily imply approval or support of the system itself. A more wordy but polarizing way of saying it, but I think one that maybe expresses this idea better, can be found in Lysander Spooner's No Treason, No. II [boldface mine]: Quote:
Last edited by Iandefor : 11-18-2007 at 08:23 PM. | |
| Bovina Sancta! Mohandas Gandhi broke the law, too. | ||
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Administrator Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 605
| In my country we get the non-voters who don't necessarily disapprove of the system but rather the candidates. The general response from them is "I don't vote because there is nobody worth voting for". My response to this is twofold. If you don't vote then you don't have the right to complain about the actions of those politicians who are voted into power. Also if you are serious that none of them are worth voting for then find and propose a candidate who is or stand yourself. In this country that is a feasible option. I am sick of people who don't bother to turn out to vote and then spend all their time giving out about the policies introduced by the government. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Stirrer Of Shit | If you don't participate by either not voting or wasting your vote, you have no grounds for complaint anyway as far as I'm concerned. |
| Eric "For whoever habitually suppresses the truth in the interests of tact will produce a deformity from the womb of his thought." -Sir Basil H. Liddel-Hart http://self-composed.com | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Stirrer Of Shit | Quote:
Win win situation. | |
| Eric "For whoever habitually suppresses the truth in the interests of tact will produce a deformity from the womb of his thought." -Sir Basil H. Liddel-Hart http://self-composed.com | ||
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Reliable Music I Got Left To Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 844
| Quote:
But the fact is, it is not just a right and a privilege, but also legally a civil responsibility here. There aren't many duties expected of you for being an Australian, but voting is one. I guess some people complain about jury duty too - seems the same principle to me.If you really don't want to cast a vote, you can easily cast an invalid vote. Fully agree with earlier comments in the topic by Iandefor and mmccarthy by the way. | |
|
___________________________ Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans. - John Lennon | ||
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Stirrer Of Shit | I definately disagree with making it a "duty." You end up forcing uninformed morons into casting a ballot. There's enough of them voting voluntarily already. I say look for ways to restrict who is eligible to vote in a way that allows anyone who wants to cast an informed vote can if they meet requirements, but not out of hand. For example, I don't think individuals receiving a hand-out from the government should be allowed to vote in the U.S. At least not while we have these unconstitutional campaign finance reforms in place. If money can corrupt when its going to the politicians it sure as hell can corrupt when its coming from them too. |
| Eric "For whoever habitually suppresses the truth in the interests of tact will produce a deformity from the womb of his thought." -Sir Basil H. Liddel-Hart http://self-composed.com | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Administrator Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 605
| I have to disagree Rasczak. From a female point of view, it took too long for us to get the vote. Any restrictions on who has the right to vote is a step backwards. It also opens the door to even more corruption. The reality in this country is lower income/welfare families rarely vote. It would be interesting to see the results if they did. |
| | |