Say Hello! Networking for Professionals
Register Get Password Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Join the Discussion

Not a member yet? Register for FREE!
Go Back   Join the Discussion / Discussion Groups / Health and Fitness
Reload this Page The battle for Raw milk

Health and Fitness Work it! Discussions about staying in shape, eating right . Exercise, nutrition, health, illness and more.

JOIN TODAY! It's FREE . . . Discuss topics and issues that matter to you!

8,000 active members posting their views, facts and opinions on issues and topics that are important to people of today.

Join a Discussion or better yet and Start a Discussion of your own!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-08-2007   #1 (permalink)
NoTiG
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 192
Default The battle for Raw milk

Digg - Legalize it (Raw milk) - NY times article

In the same way that washing your hands too often with antibacterial soap makes you prone to sickness, pasteurizing milk kills off the billions of good bacteria that would otherwise benefit you. Please do not outlaw raw milk, if you are going to make something illegal make the selling of milk from sick cows illegal. Sick milk comes from sick cows.

I think it is kind of atrocious that the government can just claim that something we have done for thousands of years (drink raw milk) is now bad for us... and outlaw it. Even if that were true we have a right to our own bodies... but the great catch is that they are totally wrong. You want an example of the government infringing on our liberties? The illegalization of raw milk is one example.
NoTiG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007   #2 (permalink)
OrangeCrate
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,576
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoTiG View Post
I think it is kind of atrocious that the government can just claim that something we have done for thousands of years (drink raw milk) is now bad for us... and outlaw it.
Ya, well, the average life expectancy for those folks living thousands of years ago, was about 35 years.

We've learned a lot about general health issues, and sanitary practices, and pasteurization is one of those wonderful things, in my opinion, that contributes to the long life spans we enjoy today.

I do agree however, that there are points to be made on both sides of the issue.

Pasteurization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Last edited by OrangeCrate : 08-09-2007 at 04:39 AM. Reason: Syntax
OrangeCrate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007   #3 (permalink)
Taj
Commentator
 
Taj's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Carroll County, OH
Posts: 62
Send a message via ICQ to Taj Send a message via AIM to Taj Send a message via Yahoo to Taj
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeCrate View Post
Ya, well, the average life expectancy for those folks living thousands of years ago, was about 35 years.

We've learned a lot about general health issues, and sanitary practices, and pasteurization is one of those wonderful things, in my opinion, that contributes to the long life spans we enjoy today.

I do agree however, that there are points to be made on both sides of the issue.

Pasteurization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pasteurization is good for selling cow milk in massive quantities - when mixing milk from 10,000 different cows, you HAVE to pasturize it to get rid of all the germs etc, especially considering how cows are treated (the conditions most milk cows live in today are positively atrocios). If we simply treatd cows decently you COULD drink their milk raw, without pasturization. But, when you confine them to a shed, don't allow them to eat what they were meant to (grass), move around, and shoot them full of hormones, antiboitics, etc... well, then you HAVE to pasturize their milk because its sick milk from sick cows!
Proud nursing mama to Andros 3/07

"Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic in it" Goethe
Taj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007   #4 (permalink)
NoTiG
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 192
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taj View Post
Pasteurization is good for selling cow milk in massive quantities - when mixing milk from 10,000 different cows, you HAVE to pasturize it to get rid of all the germs etc, especially considering how cows are treated (the conditions most milk cows live in today are positively atrocios). If we simply treatd cows decently you COULD drink their milk raw, without pasturization. But, when you confine them to a shed, don't allow them to eat what they were meant to (grass), move around, and shoot them full of hormones, antiboitics, etc... well, then you HAVE to pasturize their milk because its sick milk from sick cows!
I somewhat agree with that. But they should not make selling milk illegal from properly grass fed pastured dairy. Make the selling of milk from sick cows illegal instead.
NoTiG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007   #5 (permalink)
NoTiG
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 192
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeCrate View Post
Ya, well, the average life expectancy for those folks living thousands of years ago, was about 35 years.

We've learned a lot about general health issues, and sanitary practices, and pasteurization is one of those wonderful things, in my opinion, that contributes to the long life spans we enjoy today.

I do agree however, that there are points to be made on both sides of the issue.

Pasteurization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Our increased sanitation and technology is precisely just another reason yet why we should allow raw milk. With regulation and sanitation you can easily avoid sanitation problems like dirty containers, and transportation ETC

- Part of the reason why the average life expectancy is up is because not as many people die during child birth (which lowers the life expectancy) . Also infections from wounds and surgeries etc. The only food that is pasteurized on a wide scale is milk and to declare that is one of the reasons why our life expectancy has gone up is ludicrous

- Every person has about 5 pounds of bacteria in their body. In fact you have more cells from bacteria in your body than your own. Every person has some bad bacteria in their body... and some good. What is important for health is the balance of good to bad.. that is why raw milk is so good besides the fact that it has enzymes to digest the lactase... it gives us a good source of probiotics. Any time you pasteurize something or sterlizie it you lower it's immunity. When doctors prescribe antibiotics instead of probiotics.. they kill off all the bacteria. The person suffers from symptoms of lowered immunity beause of this. When you wash your hands with anti bacterial soap you have a statistically lowered immunity. When you swim in chlorine pools that kill the bacteria it is the same thing. As long as you get milk from healthy cows, not only will you not get sick but it will do just the opposite, and strengthen your immunity.

There only proof that raw milk is dangerous comes from the early 20th century during the depression when cows were confined and fed such a poor diet that their milk was blue... from such a low fat count. People got sick off of it because the cows were sick. Then they figured out that if they pasteurized this putrid sick milk they wouldn't get sick.. but do you really want to be drinking milk from sick cows?

Neither you or the government has the business of telling people what they should be able to eat. Do you want cheeseburgers illegalized next because they contain cholesterol? Not only is it an infringement on our rights... but much of the time the establishment is completely wrong. The FDA frequently tells the OPPOSITE of what is correct. For instance the substitution of margarine full of trans fats for butter. Coconut oil and saturated fats have been demonized for decades now and the people are brainwashed to think they are bad... just like raw milk. Not only is this an infringement on our rights, the OPPOSITE is true.

If you leave a glass of raw milk, and a glass of store milk on the counter guess which one will putrefy? The lactoferrin and good bacteria in raw milk actually make it safer and prevent random bacteria from colonating it. If you left them both out the raw milk would naturally curdle and become sour. The pasteurized would simply putrefy.

There is no reason whatsoever for raw milk to be illegal. I simply cannot see where a conflict of interest may lie.. so I simply attest it to germophobes.

Louis Pasteur = wrong
Beauchamp = right

The Germ Theory: A Faulty Medical Model
NoTiG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007   #6 (permalink)
yaaarrrgg
Eligible for a custom title
 
yaaarrrgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 791
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

If you look at goveg.com, they act like milk is bad for you altogether.

MilkSucks.com: Find Out More
yaaarrrgg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007   #7 (permalink)
NoTiG
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 192
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaaarrrgg View Post
If you look at goveg.com, they act like milk is bad for you altogether.

MilkSucks.com: Find Out More
I've read some of the arguments against milk.. it is one of the most common allergens for a reason. But the fact that milk CAN be healthy... is proven by societies who subsist off it. In sweden for example, before pasteurization and modern man's diet... there was a low incidence of dental carries... much lower disease and illness. You can guess what happened when they changed their diet. The same thing with the masai tribe in Africa who nearly live off it.

There are a couple of considerations to make when declaring whether it is simply unhealthy or healthy.. For one your blood type and genetic disposition makes a difference.... The diet of the cows producing the milk makes a difference... the species of the animal makes a difference (for instance goat or sheep has smaller protein molecules than cow and is easier to digest) and the preparation methods make a difference (such as raw as opposed to pasteurized... and fermented as opposed to not)

So I would not just claim milk is unhealthy. That is proven false... if you are going to declare it broadly. But it is bad for many people who might not even realize it. Raw milk is of course much better (but still not great for everyone) .

Soy milk is really bad though... it's funny how a vegetarian site might not mention that!
NoTiG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007   #8 (permalink)
LordFu
I see the Fnords.
 
LordFu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 830
Send a message via Yahoo to LordFu
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

This is just another example of government interference. If people want to drink raw milk, why should anyone else care? This nanny mentality, that we must protect people from themselves, is idiotic.
For just an instant, have a glimpse, a vision, of life through my eyes. It is a staggeringly joyous perspective, a view of how each person's choices can make their own life better. It is a vision of the possible, of how things can and should be.
LordFu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007   #9 (permalink)
NoTiG
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 192
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

Thanks for the support ! I wonder if Ron paul would do anything to help this issue... or if it is simply a matter of states rights >< . If the states infringe on our rights though i think the fed is allowed to step in maybe?
NoTiG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007   #10 (permalink)
hairy_Palms
Chuck Norris
 
hairy_Palms's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London, England
Posts: 330
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

banning raw milk?????? ffs..... none of these knobends ever been to a farm?? seriously why not ban any dish made with raw meat or fish too, sushi? banned! blue steak? banned!!
http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/
"Creationism is not a scientific alternative to natural selection any more than the stork theory is an alternative to sexual reproduction." — Hayes, 1996.
hairy_Palms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2007   #11 (permalink)
fuscia
....
 
fuscia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 558
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

are humans and oppurtunistic housecats the only species that drink the milk of species other than their own?
fuscia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2007   #12 (permalink)
NoTiG
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 192
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

Quote:
Originally Posted by fuscia View Post
are humans and oppurtunistic housecats the only species that drink the milk of species other than their own?
nope. I have seen puppies wean off of a pig for instance.

We do alot of things other species don't do... cooking our food for instance....

some people on the paleo diet argue that nobody should drink milk since it was only supposedly introduced within the last few thousand years of human evolution. ALl i can say is that it works for some people and doesn't for others
NoTiG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2007   #13 (permalink)
OrangeCrate
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,576
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoTiG View Post
Soy milk is really bad though... it's funny how a vegetarian site might not mention that!
How's soy milk bad for you?
OrangeCrate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2007   #14 (permalink)
NoTiG
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 192
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeCrate View Post
How's soy milk bad for you?
Soy Alert!

http://www.mercola.com/article/soy/index.htm
NoTiG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2007   #15 (permalink)
hairy_Palms
Chuck Norris
 
hairy_Palms's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London, England
Posts: 330
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

i dunno about soy milk being bad for you, but it certainly tastes REALLY bad on cereal
http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/
"Creationism is not a scientific alternative to natural selection any more than the stork theory is an alternative to sexual reproduction." — Hayes, 1996.
hairy_Palms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007   #16 (permalink)
bvc
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 113
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

I completely agree NoTiG.
A CAMPAIGN FOR REAL (RAW) MILK!
Where Can I Find Real Milk Products?
bvc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007   #17 (permalink)
Iandefor
Super Moderator
 
Iandefor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The rainy dreary horrible northwest corner of the US
Posts: 460
Send a message via AIM to Iandefor Send a message via Yahoo to Iandefor
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

My own two cents: It's none of the government's damn business. If I want to drink raw milk, I can think of no reason why they have the right to prevent me.

Last edited by Iandefor : 08-12-2007 at 01:50 PM.
Bovina Sancta!
Mohandas Gandhi broke the law, too.
Iandefor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007   #18 (permalink)
OrangeCrate
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,576
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeCrate View Post
Ya, well, the average life expectancy for those folks living thousands of years ago, was about 35 years.

We've learned a lot about general health issues, and sanitary practices, and pasteurization is one of those wonderful things, in my opinion, that contributes to the long life spans we enjoy today.

I do agree however, that there are points to be made on both sides of the issue.

Pasteurization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iandefor View Post
...And pasteurization has been around how long?
What does this have to do with my original statement?

Quote:
It's none of the government's damn business anyway. If I want to drink raw milk, I can think of no reason why they have the right to prevent me.
Where in my post does it say that I disagree with you? Did you read this?

Quote:
I do agree however, that there are points to be made on both sides of the issue.
OrangeCrate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007   #19 (permalink)
bvc
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 113
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

so...life expectancy for those folks living thousands of years ago, was about 35 years, because of raw milk?
bvc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007   #20 (permalink)
OrangeCrate
Eligible for a custom title
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,576
Default Re: The battle for Raw milk

Quote:
Originally Posted by bvc View Post
so...life expectancy for those folks living thousands of years ago, was about 35 years, because of raw milk?
Don't read anything more into my post, than what I said there.

Quote:
We've learned a lot about general health issues, and sanitary practices, and pasteurization is one of those wonderful things, in my opinion, that contributes to the long life spans we enjoy today.
OrangeCrate is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 PM.



vBulletin® Version 3.6.7. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32