I admit that particular example is over-simplified and, therefor, flawed. The House example remains true, I feel. Isn't logic the means by which we can go from one point to another in order to understand or explain things? Is an explanation with holes a complete one, or simply an expanded theory?
I ask these questions because I don't know the answers. Most of you here seem to have an extensive background in logic where I have none, so these may be silly things to ask to you, but seem like good questions to me. Please, I look forward to having them answered.