This particular graph was actually a fraud. The scientists purposefully made up false data points. If you can pull up the title of the study I can show where scientists pointed this out in peer-review. The title of the study alludes me at the moment. When you "fix" the data points so to speak you can clearly see how temperatures correlate better w/ ghgs than they do w/ sunspots.


Btw this forum allows trolling I assume?

PS: All your arguments in hard-to-follow image format are addressed here, Climate change: A guide for the perplexed - earth - 16 May 2007 - New Scientist Environment (eg temperature measurement etc). I would appreciate it if you actually formed words and paragraphs instead of posting random pictures.