I don't like this woman, Jessica Beaumont, and I don't like what she says. I also don't think she should be fined for saying it. But she has, to the tune of $4500. She's posted the wrong thing on the internet, and the Canadian Human Rights commission aka thought police have fined her for posting the wrong things on American blogs.
I don't expect anyone else here to like what she's said either. She's a knuckle dragging racist and a homophobe among other things. She quotes scripture.
Should she be fined $4500 and be ordered not to post her opinions (cease and desist order) on the internet any more?
Here are some of the comments she was fined for saying:
About Muslim women keeping their hijabs on for photos: (I pretty much agree with her on this one.)
Quote:
That drives me nuts, I take photos for the citizenship, passports, pr (permanent residence), visa cards etc. and as I have been told from human resourses that the ears MUST be visable, which means, if your hair covers your ears, it has to be tucked back.
I don’t care if it’s a religious thing or not, if you don’t want to follow our rules, even if it is taking off your scarf thing for one lousy picture, then stay out of my effing country!
|
On non-white friends:
Quote:
|
I just don’t feel the need to be-friend non-whites, as they can do nothing for me, nor would I like to associate with them. I am fine with my own kind, and always will/have been. Theres my f*cking answer. Good enough? If not, PM [private message] me, well debate this some more.
|
Name five things that concern you as a Canadian citizen:
Quote:
1. Immigration
2. Freedom Of Speech (and everything else)
3. People need to wake up, and grab a sense of morality.
4. People who support “gay marriages” although are not gay, even if they are…. IT’S SICK!
5. Basis of/for Deportation for illegal immigrants (this needs to be followed through with A LOT faster, and more watched)
|
The CHRC has had at least 46 cases, 35 of the respondents have been ordered a lifetime speech ban - for breaking it (saying the wrong thing again) they could spend five years in prison.
Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act Quote:
1. It is a discriminatory practice for a person or a group of persons acting in concert to communicate telephonically or to cause to be so communicated, repeatedly, in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking within the legislative authority of Parliament, any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by reason of the fact that that person or those persons are identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.
2. For greater certainty, subsection (1) applies in respect of a matter that is communicated by means of a computer or a group of interconnected or related computers, including the Internet, or any similar means of communication, but does not apply in respect of a matter that is communicated in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a broadcasting undertaking.
3. For the purposes of this section, no owner or operator of a telecommunication undertaking communicates or causes to be communicated any matter described in subsection (1) by reason only that the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking owned or operated by that person are used by other persons for the transmission of that matter.
|
Thought police.