Or maybe you are not as people smart as you think and that is not a shot. The funny thing about people smart is that most consider themselves that way. I score low on linguistics and I was surprised about that. But that is beside the point of the test. The test is just an introduction to the freedoms afforded by learning that we often discount or disbelieve in There is always more to see if you look with different eyes. You can’t fail that test because it’s not one of valuation it is a test and a lesson of perception.

It seems to me that you may need to consider being the student as you are being the teacher. A lesson I keep having to learn time and again myself.
You bring valid and needed points to larger discussions that are generally over looked in the “normalized” mindset or the socially amalgamated intelligence of our individuals and their puny little needs posted as king.

But it seems you have dichotomized the information and remained just as out of balance and inappropriate as those aspects of intelligence as possibilities. Blame is easy, understanding why we need to is hard and never ending.

This is a very normal MISTAKE that people make when they are desperate for change, so don’t sweat it. Are you capable of leaning this? Maybe I can learn to teach you and thus experience and learn how appropriate my intelligence is.

The macro social view does allow new insight to those normally uninterested in its virtues, or seduced away from realizing them appropriately is more accurate. But it is foolish to believe that it holds all of the “correcting” answers to our problems. It is just a contrive dichotomy build in the illusion of a duality; there are more facets to examine.

There are aspects of information to consider before moving forward with condemning information’s or judgments to righteousness.
Try to step back again and understand the dynamics between the social intelligence and the personal. There is conflict to consider and to allow for in seeing new, and possibly more appropriate possibilities of reality. Hey there is ALWAYS more reality to see, but we have to be willing.

The macro social requires survival through harmonious macro methods if they are to last, the macro personals require surviving through competitions within the social if they are to last.

The social requires the competition for outwardly or progressive creativity and the personal require social harmony for this. Do you see the compounding contradictory requirements?

Another way of saying this is that socialism and capitalism are equally flawed and dangerous when considered as the only courses of understanding or if they are the only aspect of intelligence considered in our reasoning thought. The illusion that they encompass our possibilities is simply illusion and I could elaborate further, and we could, if there is enough interest.