Well I think you have added a great requirement. It is a suggestion of a less-than-usual intelligence, or an ability to employ an aptitude in grasping truths, relationships, facts, and meanings directly through the choice of will rather than through a contrived and prescribed system of belief.

This will be discussion of our intention as accountable to our reasoning perceptions in present time as an undivided intelligent system of each human being itself.

And rather than the normally discussed isms needs, or contrived intentions to authorize the human beings possibilities of perception which creates unsolvable barriers and divisions of frictioning, factioning, and unaccountability and insolvency in our conversations with each other.

Be on guard, you will be fighting the devil himself on this one. People need their illusions man. LOL. But this is a smart approach to toning down those subverted wills imo.

People sometimes hate it or us when the conversation is directed to become an examination of their own minds processes rather than a conversation about what their mind wants to project as paradigm of safety or righteousness in a dangerous and uncertain world.

This is where we may end up separating the philosophers from the fanatics. I need time to think about how I would like to address what you offer as subject matter, maybe some days. Sorry, life calls too. But thanks for the smart start Jasper84.