Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeCrate  |
Yes, Really.
As I said:
Quote:
|
I think that the only people who would be turned off voting for Hillary due to Bill's involvement, would be those who wouldn't vote for her anyway, hence his involvement will be a net gain for her chances
|
Nobody buys into that circus as rjwood describes it (my choice of words would probably have been 'joke') other than those who would be very unlikely to vote for Clinton or any Democrat for that matter.
It really is a sad reflection on the USA that 1 president gets persecuted and eventually impeached for his sexual escapades with staff members (please don't give me any 'he was impeached for lying under oath' crap - clearly that was just the final act in the circus - and besides, to me the persecution is more important than the eventual impeachment), while another illegally invades a sovereign nation, does away with basic Geneva conventio nrights, and continues to act the way Bush still does today, despite the country clearly having spoken out against the war in the last election.
Bush should be impeached for being a war criminal, lying openly to justify his war, and maybe just for being a moron in the most powerful position on the planet (surely there was some form he had to fill out to become president stating that he was of sound mind and body
- that has surely turned out not to be the case).