@c.dric: ye that one is stunning, that might mean that universes might be very arbitrary; meaning that there is not meaning to this specific one. Some of the other hypothesis said similar.
This is rather a hard thread to reply to in a productive manner. I do think that some of the 'cyclic in time' multiverse thingies seem to ignore that arbitrariness is in the special property of time itself. (in general relativity it stems from the rotational symmetry of the 'spatial dimensions')