Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasper84  They totally miss the point in specifically pointing to 'heaven' and 'moon'. The laws of physics refers to laws that refer to the world. They also totally miss interpretation of those laws, nor do they even state any laws. Seems obvious that they refer only to motion of planets and constellations as they saw moving points in the sky. |
The point is not which laws exist, but when the thought of laws came into existance. Far before any other philiospher or physicist, the revelation of laws and principles which govern the universe, given in a very early time period, gives evidence of an intellegent designer and creator. We are not here to debate where laws apply, but the existance of a creator and the theory of evolution.
AS for the water cycle, again consider the timelines please. Conisder the date when that scripture was written, and when the water cycle was fully outlined in history. Im providing evidence of intelligent design. So many things are necessary for life on this planet. A house does not build itself, neither can a full ecosystem develop conditions necessary for life, when life is a necessary condition for an ecosystem iself!Oh man, im thinking too much right now...perhaps ive had too much coffee..
And, again, evolution does not answer where life origionally came from.