@SenixMarcoviAhaa: You are not making the slightest sense. Either you are an idiot, and really do not know shit, or you have studied math/physics, and are genuinely talking about some new approach.
If it is the latter, I have not the slightest idea how you thought introducing this idea this way was a good idea that would actually convey a message.(so i am guessing brainfart? everyone makes mistakes..)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SenixMarcoviAhaa the following formulas explain the world of science and humans perfectly: |
BS, you can explain everything in science with 6 sentences?
The math is still valid under given axioms. You could be saying that this used in physics is an approximation that we will have to eventually give up. (in fact i someone on socialdicussion posted something like letting go of normal logic for QM, i am planning to read more about that at some point)
The operator = is usually used as equivalence relation.
Definition equivalence relation: function from A x A to boolean, which i will denote x=y such that:
(a=b) => (b=a)
((a=b) and (b=c)) => (a=c)
In what you are talking about implies it is not an equivalence relation. But then again, we do not even know what set those elements are in..