Originally Posted by Jasper84

He is presenting it as an axiom, silly, does not need to prove it. Or are you still using your old definition of an axiom, in #63 i suggested "defining an axiom any assumption. Anyone can assume any set of axioms (s)he believes do not contradict.", hmm i should have added that they should not follow from each other either.(but that does not mean they do not rely on each other) BTW never heard of unpredictability theory before.

I still do not dig that axiom, you mean something like: You cannot predict what feelings or actions follow from thinking. Eh, do I know what others think in the first place? And why add the word "cognitive", might aswel just say thinking.