View Single Post
Old 05-15-2007   #49 (permalink)
jasonlfunk
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 57
Default Re: Argument for God's Existance

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshJ View Post
Except for the fact that the only reason the argument supposes god in the first place is the assumption that "Everything must have a cause", which leads to the problem of turtles all the way down.

Richard Dawkins's The God Delusion has an excellent refutation of the ontological argument.

1 The creation of the world is the most marvellous achievement
imaginable.
2 The merit of an achievement is the product of (a) its intrinsic
quality, and (b) the ability of its creator.
3 The greater the disability (or handicap) of the creator, the more
impressive the achievement.
4 The most formidable handicap for a creator would be nonexistence.
5 Therefore if we suppose that the universe is the product of an
existent creator we can conceive a greater being - namely, one
who created everything while not existing.
6 An existing God therefore would not be a being greater than
which a greater cannot be conceived because an even more formidable and incredible creator would be a God which did not
exist.
Ergo:
7 God does not exist.
I have never once said, and I agree with you that the argument falls apart, if the 1st premise is that Everything has a cause. If this is true, any certain knowledge is impossible.

And Dawkin's argument is ridiculous and I won't say any more about it. It is a good example of an argument that someone wanting to not believe in God makes. Too many rabbit trails in the thread already though so I'll drop it.
jasonlfunk is offline   Reply With Quote